June 28, 2021
Oct 1, 2024
Editorial credit: Kylie Cooper/The Texas Tribune
In response to Webster’s appeal of the Court of Appeals ruling in his case, LDAD and the Texas lawyers filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court of Texas supporting the State Bar and providing further arguments rebutting Webster’s position. Our brief argues that, under Texas law, separation of powers is no bar to judicial branch disciplinary proceedings for professional misconduct against a Texas-licensed attorney serving as Attorney General because an Attorney General has no “constitutionally assigned power” to violate Texas’s ethics rules. Further, such disciplinary proceedings are not within sovereign immunity’s purposes of protecting the public treasury and preventing judicial interference with the effective exercise of executive duties.
The case is now pending before the Texas Supreme Court, which heard oral argument on September 12.
LDAD Co-Founder Gershon (Gary) Ratner, who co-authored the briefs, stated: “As a Texas-licensed lawyer, Webster is statutorily subject to disciplinary proceedings for professional misconduct, just like all other Texas-licensed lawyers. As Webster concedes, an Attorney General and his Assistants have no legal authority to violate Texas’s ethics rules. The Texas Supreme Court needs to avoid creating a two-tier system of justice – one for Attorney General’s office lawyers and one for all others.”
Be the first to know about LDAD news by following us on LinkedIn or signing up for our newsletter.
All Rights Reserved. © 2024