We believe that as members of the legal community, we have a unique responsibility to defend the Constitution and the values on which our democracy depends.
We have launched numerous initiatives addressing threats to our democracy and have sought accountability for those in our profession who violated their ethical obligations.
We invite you to speak out, get involved, and join our efforts to protect democracy and the rule of law at this critical time.
Project 2025 embodies an agenda led by the Heritage Foundation to revise, reorganize and eliminate vast portions of the statutes, rules and norms that were built over decades, and that have guided our democracy and preserved our freedoms during Republican and Democratic administrations alike.
All of us, and lawyers in particular, have a role to play in discussing with others the nature of the proposed changes and how they endanger our freedom. To facilitate those discussions, Lawyers Defending American Democracy's “Talking Points” series highlights changes that Project 2025 is intent on making and their potential effect.
As reported previously, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and First Assistant Brent Webster have sought to dismiss, based on separation of powers and sovereign immunity, State Bar ethics proceedings against each of them for misrepresentations to the U.S. Supreme Court in their lawsuit to overturn the 2020 presidential election. LDAD and 16 distinguished Texas lawyers filed amicus briefs in the respective Courts of Appeals in the Paxton and Webster cases. Both courts rejected the separation of powers and sovereign immunity arguments. In the Webster opinion, the court made several points that LDAD had argued in its brief.
Update: LDAD and States United Democracy Center File Ethics Complaints Against Attorney Kurt Olsen
Be the first to know about LDAD news by following us on LinkedIn or signing up for our newsletter.
All Rights Reserved. © 2024