
June 28, 2021
Oct 1, 2025
Photo Credit: Shutterstock
At the plaintiffs’ request, LDAD’s brief focuses on two core issues: standing and appropriations law. The denial of access harms individual Members of Congress by violating a statutory right unique to them. In addition, the fact that the provision explicitly granting access without prior notice is in an appropriations law does not affect its legal enforceability.
“Federal law explicitly protects Members of Congress’ right to unannounced oversight visits,” said Mitt Regan, McDevitt Professor of Jurisprudence at Georgetown University Law Center and a principal author of the brief. “ICE’s policy violates both the letter and spirit of that law.”
Update: On December 17, 2025, a federal judge issued a 73-page ruling that blocked the Trump administration’s efforts to impose notice requirements on members of Congress seeking to conduct oversight at detention facilities operated by ICE.


All Rights Reserved. © 2026
General Inquiries • Press Inquiries • Follow on: LinkedIn • Instagram • Bluesky • Facebook