
June 28, 2021
Aug 11, 2025
Editorial credit: Francis Chung/POLITICO
Nearly four years ago, LDAD filed an extensive complaint before the DC Office of Disciplinary Counsel against Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Clark – a complaint that was also signed by many prominent members of the DC Bar. The complaint alleged that Clark’s post-election efforts sought to pressure Justice Department leaders to issue a knowingly false statement that there was evidence of significant fraud in the 2020 presidential election.
In a comprehensive Report and Recommendation that demonstrates what accountability looks like, the DC Board of Professional Responsibility determined that Clark should be disbarred for his efforts to assist in undermining the integrity of that election. LDAD's analysis was substantially identical to the ruling by the Board.
In its recommendation, the Board stated:
“Lawyers cannot advocate for any outcome based on false statements and they certainly cannot urge others to do so. Respondent persistently and energetically sought to do just that on an important national issue. He should be disbarred as a consequence and to send a message to the rest of the Bar and to the public that this behavior will not be tolerated.”
The DC Court of Appeals issued an Order pursuant to DC Bar Rules directing Mr. Clark to "show cause" why he should not be suspended pending the Court's decision on the D.C. Board of Professional Responsibility's disbarment recommendation. Mr. Clark filed a response to the Court's Order, but the Court has not, as yet, ruled on the suspension issue so he is currently not suspended. (Our original statement that Mr. Clark had been suspended while the appeal was pending was mistaken.)


All Rights Reserved. © 2026
General Inquiries • Press Inquiries • Follow on: LinkedIn • Instagram • Bluesky • Facebook